Episode Guides Firefly Serenity Home
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Serenity Joss says: “It captured exactly what I was looking for and it was the first time that I got to realise that all of my actors were extraordinary and embodied the people they were playing to a frightening extent. Everything was so easy, which should have been my first warning that there was trouble ahead.

“My whole mission statement was a sort of ‘70s Western kind of feel to it, which is very much like a lot of TV shows these days with hand-held cameras and a sort of sloppiness. It was always meant to look dirty and have a quality of, ‘Oh, they happened to have a camera there,’ still controlling everything people were seeing very specifically, pretending that you’re not. That was done to get away from the science fiction and the pomp; the stately, sterile morality tales that I felt were a little dull. I wanted to do something that felt contemporary.”

Last Updated
5 Sept 2005



BACK TO SERENITY | BACK TO TOP
The Train Job Joss says: “It was Friday afternoon at 5:00. the network called and said, ‘We’d like you to write a new pilot that will be one hour long, and we’d like it on our desk before we get into work on Monday.’ Tim Minear and I looked at each and said, ‘Okay’, and in two days we wrote ‘The Train Job’, which had the difficult task of trying to introduce nine people who have already met to an audience without making it sound really hokey. A lot got lost on people. The show wasn’t originally going to be as action-orientated as it ended up being. It’s a drama in space, which is why we have so many people with some action and, obviously, humour. ‘The Train Job’ didn’t have the time necessary to make you care about all these people. You saw them go by in a flash and we hope you picked up on who they were and what they did.
Last Updated
5 Sept 2005



BACK TO THE TRAIN JOB | BACK TO TOP
Bushwhacked Joss says: “I learned something on that show. I have always been extremely strict with my actors about dialogue, down to every comma. I will go nuts on them. We had a basketball scene with a bunch of scripted stuff and I was, like, ‘You are just going to turn the cameras on and let them play for a while, right?’ and Tim Minear said, ‘Yeah, of course.’ Well, we ended up tossing out all the scripted stuff and only using the improv stuff while they were playing. All of that was just them having a great time, which they really were. That kind of trust and freedom for the actors was a new thing for me. I’m a very controlling filmmaker. That’s just an example of how much that set was a creative place. The other thing I remember about that episode is they felt the need to have real food on the set, so we had rotten beans and all that in the kitchen set on the other ship. I’m sorry, no art is worth that.”
Last Updated
5 Sept 2005



BACK TO BUSHWHACKED | BACK TO TOP
Shindig Joss says: "The whole point of the show, and the series, is that we take our cultures with us. They mutate, they meld and they disintegrate, but they’re always there. If you have a world that doesn’t have roads, you’re not going to use a car. If you are in a civilisation that is new, you’re going to take the oldest traditions because you need something to hold on to.

“If the show’s about anything, it’s about the way in which we create a civilisation in a void. What we bring with us, what each one of us brings with us that we need, which we touch on sometimes. It gives you a chance to tell what is ultimately a big immigrant story, which is ultimately what America was. The original germ of the idea of the series came from the Civil War, based on Reconstruction as an era. The great thing is you read about Jewish freedom fighters in the Warsaw Ghetto, it’s applicable. All of history gets mashed up and served out, that’s how the world works.”

Last Updated
5 Sept 2005



BACK TO SHINDIG | BACK TO TOP
Safe Joss says: “This was an example of things not going the way that we wanted originally. We had a completely different bunch of flashbacks [featuring Simon and river’s past life] with a completely different bunch of actors. The idea of Simon realising he has found a home; that a real parent isn’t somebody who’s extremely great, but only when it’s convenient, it’s somebody who, no matter how rough they might be, will never let you down. And that was sort of what Mal becomes in that episode, and that meant a lot to me. It showed why Simon was so protective of his sister.

“We did the flashbacks and they were just sort of histrionic and didn’t feel right, and we didn’t have the one with the two little kids. It started out with River already in trouble and I said, ‘Let’s see the two of them together.’ Then we couldn’t get the original people who played the father and mother, because they’d already been booked for something else, so we had to cast that again. It was all very complicated and strange.

“And then we felt, ‘We’ve got our big damn heroes, we’ve got the crucible, we’ve got our witch hunters and everything is coming together, but we really could use a shot of humour.’ So I said, ‘Lock the thing, give me 30 seconds in this act and 15 seconds in this act, and I’ll write some Jayne scenes and we’ll do them to time.’ At the last minute, days before it was supposed to air, Adam Baldwin came in and did the scenes of him going through Simons stuff, knowing that he had about 16 props that he had to work with, one after the other, and exactly 30 seconds. It was so complicated, but he did it. That’s the time you’re very grateful for professionalism. It’s hilarious and it helps to thematically say they’re not part of the group.

“Sometimes we get cuts and we just go, ‘This sucks’ and it’s because we haven’t communicated with the director or they haven’t captured what we were looking for, or structurally we were missing a piece and we didn’t get it until we saw it. You never know, even if you’re on set a lot. Something could still come out wrong".

Last Updated
5 Sept 2005














BACK TO SAFE | BACK TO TOP
Our Mrs Reynolds Joss says: “That was a really interesting one for me. I just never had a writing experience like that before. I literally wrote stuff down, then looked at it and said, ‘Where did that come from?’ I just couldn’t stop writing. It sort of wrote itself, and I’ve never said that before. When Mal starts talking to Saffron about his life, I didn’t know any of that stuff; I didn’t plan any of that. Then I sat down and looked at it and said, ‘Why is he talking so much? Oh, because she’s one of those people who makes people talk so much.’ Then Wash does the same thing and you realise that she’s just one of those people who get you to open up and then kind of sets you against everybody else. The amount of fun that I had writing that could not be greater. This episode really represented the original mission statement for the show; have nine people so you can throw pebbles in a pond and that’s your show. You don’t need a giant guest star explosion monster. You can just do one thing and spend the show having everybody react to it. That episode showed that off so well.”
Last Updated
5 Sept 2005




BACK TO OUR MRS REYNOLDS | BACK TO TOP
Jaynestown Joss says: “One of the first times we began to realise what a force we had with [writer] Ben Edlund, who pitched the idea to me. Very few ideas are ever actually pitched to me. I tend to come up with them myself or in concert with Tim or Marti Noxon or David Fury. Or I tend to come in with some idea like, ‘We really need to feel scared. I want the insecurity of… blah, blah, blah.’ It’s usually the process of developing the idea from something I pitched out.

“On Firefly we were hearing pitches and would have had more opportunities to do stuff that came directly from the writers, but Ben is one of those guys who comes up with ideas – and he’s doing it on Angel, too – where you go, ‘Uh… yes. Wait a minute… Never mind, I’ll just be over here.’

“I also think that Jayne is an amazing character. To get underneath the character without lying; without saying, ‘No, he’s the sweetest man that ever lived.’ Basically just somebody who’s decent enough to be frustrated that people think he’s more decent than he is. That, to me, is a fun character to write.”

Last Updated
5 Sept 2005






BACK TO JAYNESTOWN | BACK TO TOP
Out of Gas Joss says: “My single favourite episode. I broke the story very specifically with Tim. I pitched almost all of the flashbacks, very specifically the structure, and I’m blowing my horn here about what I did because I did not write and I did not direct it, and it really is our best.

“Tim just wrote an amazing script, [director] David Solomon, who’s been with me since the beginning of Buffy, shot it very beautifully. I don’t think anything got to the heart of both what we wanted the show to be and what the show was. “Apart from the flashbacks, just the very ending of seeing Serenity from across a crowded room and falling in love, it explains so much about our characters and who they were and what they wanted. It was such a simple premise: ‘The ship is gonna break, we’re all gonna die because of something really little and mundane.’ I just think there was more emotion, surprising humour and a perfect kind of structure to that thing than anything else we did. To me, it’s the most moving episode that we did.”

Last Updated
5 Sept 2005






BACK TO OUT OF GAS | BACK TO TOP
Ariel Joss says: "Another show that blew me away, and a lot of credit goes to Alan Krocker, who shot it. There was a lot of gorgeous footage and a lot of energy. I remember pulling into the Fox lot behind Tim, getting out of the car and going, ‘I know what the next one is’, because when you have the sword over your head the entire time of production, when you think you might be cancelled at any moment, the one great thing is you’re not allowed to go, ‘Here’s an interesting idea that we can doodle with.’ You have to go straight to the primal place: what is the most painful, the most important, the most riveting, the most telling – what will keep them in the seats? What will make them come back?

“To me, after ‘Out Of Gas’ what I needed to see was Simon and River and their world, what they had, what they lost. Really see Simon sort of taking charge, which he pretty much did. I also wanted to see Jayne betray them, because you can only be irascible so long before you’re just loveable.”

Last Updated
5 Sept 2005






BACK TO ARIEL | BACK TO TOP
War Stories Joss says: “I love this episode because of the Zoe-Wash relationship. That was the talking point at the very end of the picking-up process. The network said, ‘They can’t be married’, and I said, ‘Then I don’t want you to pick up the show.’ The last thing they said was, ‘We’re thinking about picking up the show, we read ‘The Train Job’, and we think it can work, but we don’t want a married couple.’ My response was, ‘I’m not making Melrose Space. I want to see a marriage. I’ve got a preacher on board, I’ve got a young girl who’s schizophrenic – I’ve got aspects of life. That’s there for a reason, and marriage is one of them.’

“What was great in ‘War Stories’ was being able to play the conflict of marriage without making it whiny and insufferable. They’re both incredibly funny and charming, and then to play that out during the torture scene – well, juxtaposition is pretty much the benchmark of my career. It doesn’t get bigger than that.

“Here’s the thing with a show. You have to understand that you are collaborating with somebody, and they have the right to the kind of show that’s right for their network. You also have to understand that you must run that show, not them, and that it must be your show. You cannot make a show to please a network, and if you start taking a show and changing it to please a network until it loses all meaning you’re not going to please the network, because ultimately the show that works is the show that has a vision. That doesn’t mean that everything I do works. I’m sure there are shows that were built by committee, but the fact of the matter is, for a show to really work, you have to run it. Every time the network gave me a note, like, ‘Make Mal more likeable’, I can do that. ‘Have more action?’ I can do that. Those things don’t destroy what it is that I’m trying to do. ‘Make them not married’ – now you’re telling me you don’t want to make the show I want to make. That’s when you walk away. If you’re desperate to get a show on the air, you shouldn’t be trying to. That’s just not a way to live. I’m very fortunate in that I can walk away. And I would have walked away from Buffy if they’d tried to mutate it into something I didn’t believe in. You have to know where to draw the line and where to pick your battles. You want to collaborate, but you don’t want to be bullied into making a show that’s not your own, because ultimately you’ll hate it.”

Last Updated
5 Sept 2005













BACK TO WAR STORIES | BACK TO TOP
Trash Joss says: “Another heist episode which was fun, there were a lot of things to play. It really was the lightest episode we did and really an opportunity to play around with everybody, more than anything else.

“Obviously we like to hit a few issues, and I was interested in Saffron’s psychosis and I liked breaking it down like that, and seeing what was behind it. It doesn’t mean you catch her, doesn’t mean you win, but her interplay with Mal speaks a lot about both of them. It just came out fun.”

Last Updated
5 Sept 2005


BACK TO TRASH | BACK TO TOP
The Message Joss says: “This is the episode where I had to tell everybody we were cancelled, and we were right in the middle of making it. It was right before Christmas. I love that episode because, obviously, it dealt with war, Mal’s morality and a dead body, which is always fun. It bears an enormous sadness. Considering it’s all about death and betrayal and honour and sadness, it worked out just fine. It bore that because everybody knew it was over, except for me, who refuses to admit it. It’s part of my charm really.”
Last Updated
5 Sept 2005
BACK TO THE MESSAGE | BACK TO TOP
Heart Of Gold Joss says: “I think it came together really well, but on the first cut everything was kind of wrong. We’d done this early enough in the process where we could look at it and say, ‘Nobody but us seems to have gotten the memo to tone down the Western thing,’ because everything looked so Western that we thought, ‘The network is going to kill us. This is like we’re spitting in their face. They’re so nervous about this Western thing and here we are looking like an episode of Bonanza.’ We did a few reshoots and changed a couple of lines to sort out the idea of why it was the way it was. So we did a lot of tweaking.”
Last Updated
5 Sept 2005

BACK TO HEART OF GOLD | BACK TO TOP
Objects In Space Joss says: "About as big a labour of love as I’ve ever done. One of the two or three episodes I’m proudest of that I’ve made of any show. But not unstrange. It was very much an existentional statement of the meaning of objects in space and how they contain meaning within themselves, how we approach that, how two people see them in a way that everyday people don’t, and what the essential difference is. And what the essential difference is, is that one of them, the bounty hunter, is innately bringing evil with him; and one of them, River, is innately bringing love. That was sort of what I wanted to say with it.

“On the DVD, it comes with the most pretentious, repetitive and probably incoherent commentary I have ever done. I really tried to explain exactly what it was that I was trying to do, and some of it defies explanation. The ecstasy of meaninglessness is something that you can’t really explain very well in a boring commentary. I think the episode itself does it beautifully."

Last Updated
5 Sept 2005





BACK TO OBJECTS IN SPACE | BACK TO TOP

Page created, designed and maintained by Cider | Graphics by Angelus1753 | Written in Notepad, published by Homestead.